
© Pearson Education Ltd. Specimen Paper 2 (Higher, calculator), question 6.
Show answer
| Answer | £8112 | 2 marks |
|---|
Worked solution Checked against the mark scheme
Multiplier for 4% growth:
Watch out: Using simple interest to get £8100.
Ratio, proportion and rates of change
24 past-paper questions, easiest first. Try each one, then reveal the answer.
Revision guide by The Full Marks
Compound interest, population growth and depreciation all change by the same percentage each time period, so you apply a multiplier again and again. These questions are common on calculator papers.
Compound interest, growth and decay are on both tiers; general iterative rules are Higher only.
Example 1 Foundation · grade 5
Grace invests £4000 at compound interest per year. How much is in the account after years?
Multiplier
Answer: £4307.56
Example 2 Higher · grade 6
A car worth £18 000 loses of its value each year. After how many whole years is it first worth less than £10 000?
Multiplier
:
:
Answer: years
Example 3 Higher · grade 6
A van loses of its value in the first year and of its value in each year after that. After 3 years it is worth £8262. How much was it worth when new?
Multipliers: for year 1, then for years 2 and 3
Overall multiplier
Original value
Original value
Answer: £12 000
Multiply the amount by , where is the rate and the number of years. Subtract the original if you want just the interest.
A loss in value over time, like a car getting cheaper each year. Use a multiplier below 1, such as 0.88 for 12% a year.

© Pearson Education Ltd. Specimen Paper 2 (Higher, calculator), question 6.
| Answer | £8112 | 2 marks |
|---|
Worked solution Checked against the mark scheme
Multiplier for 4% growth:
Watch out: Using simple interest to get £8100.

© Pearson Education Ltd. November 2024 Paper 3 (Foundation, calculator), question 26.
| Answer | £247.40 | 3 marks |
|---|
Worked solution Checked against the mark scheme
Multiplier:
After 3 years:
Interest:
Watch out: Using simple interest to get £243.

© Pearson Education Ltd. June 2024 Paper 3 (Foundation, calculator), question 25.
| Answer | (accept , , ) | 4 marks |
|---|
Worked solution Checked against the mark scheme
Multiplier for a 6% increase:
So about workers.
Watch out: Using simple interest: .

© Pearson Education Ltd. November 2023 Paper 2 (Foundation, calculator), question 24.
| Answer | £4811.20 | 2 marks |
|---|
Worked solution Checked against the mark scheme
Multiplier for 3.4% interest:
, so £4811.20
Watch out: Using simple interest to get £4806.

© Pearson Education Ltd. June 2023 Paper 2 (Foundation, calculator), question 27.
| Answer | Rachel's: £164 836 compared with Tamsin's £162 240 | 4 marks |
|---|
Worked solution Checked against the mark scheme
Tamsin:
Rachel:
, so Rachel's house is worth more.
Watch out: Using simple interest (adding the same increase twice).

© Pearson Education Ltd. November 2022 Paper 2 (Foundation, calculator), question 23.
| Answer | £7318.15 | 3 marks |
|---|
Worked solution Checked against the mark scheme
After year 1:
After year 2:
Watch out: Adding 4.5% simple interest to get £7315.

© Pearson Education Ltd. June 2022 Paper 2 (Foundation, calculator), question 26.
| Answer | £600.74 | 3 marks |
|---|
Worked solution Checked against the mark scheme
The multiplier for a 4% decrease is .
Value after 3 years: £600.74
Watch out: Using simple depreciation: .

© Pearson Education Ltd. June 2019 Paper 3 (Foundation, calculator), question 25.
| Answer | £12 272.71 | 3 marks |
|---|
Worked solution Checked against the mark scheme
Multiplier for 1.5% interest: 1.015
Interest:
Watch out: Using simple interest: 4 × 3000 = £12 000.

© Pearson Education Ltd. November 2018 Paper 2 (Foundation, calculator), question 23.
| (a) | Ben: £173.95 interest against Ali's £153.78 | 4 marks |
|---|---|---|
| (b) | No: Ben now gets about £182.52, still more than Ali | 1 mark |
Worked solution Checked against the mark scheme
(a) Ali: , interest
Ben: , interest
Ben gets more.
(b) Ben: , interest . Still Ben, so no change.
Watch out: Using simple interest, or comparing final totals instead of interest.

© Pearson Education Ltd. Specimen Paper 2 (Foundation, calculator), question 25.
| Answer | £8112 | 2 marks |
|---|
Worked solution Checked against the mark scheme
Multiplier for 4% growth is 1.04
Watch out: Using simple interest to get £8100.

© Pearson Education Ltd. June 2024 Paper 3 (Higher, calculator), question 14.
| Answer | £ | 4 marks |
|---|
Worked solution Checked against the mark scheme
Before the 2023 withdrawal:
Start of 2023:
Before the 2022 withdrawal:
Start of 2022:
Watch out: Subtracting the withdrawals instead of adding them back, or multiplying by 0.965 instead of dividing by 1.035.

© Pearson Education Ltd. November 2024 Paper 3 (Higher, calculator), question 12.
| (a) | £4775.38 | 3 marks |
|---|---|---|
| (b) | 3 marks |
Worked solution Checked against the mark scheme
(a)
, so £4775.38
(b) Multiplier over 2 years
Yearly multiplier
, so
Watch out: In (b), halving the total percentage loss instead of square-rooting the multiplier.

© Pearson Education Ltd. November 2022 Paper 2 (Higher, calculator), question 10.
| Answer | £17 500 | 3 marks |
|---|
Worked solution Checked against the mark scheme
Multipliers: and
Original
Original
Watch out: Adding 42% back on to £10 914.75.

© Pearson Education Ltd. November 2022 Paper 2 (Higher, calculator), question 12.
| (a) | 6 years | 2 marks |
|---|---|---|
| (b) | It would take fewer years (or it can't be known exactly) | 1 mark |
Worked solution Checked against the mark scheme
(a) Try powers of 1.13:
(not yet doubled)
(more than 2)
So it takes 6 years.
(b) If keeps growing, the population grows faster, so it would double in fewer years.
Watch out: In (b), saying it would take longer.

© Pearson Education Ltd. June 2022 Paper 3 (Higher, calculator), question 10.
| Answer | 3 marks |
|---|
Worked solution Checked against the mark scheme
Multiplier after 3 years:
Original value
Watch out: Adding the percentages (12.5 + 10 + 10 = 32.5%) or increasing £17 010 by those percentages.

© Pearson Education Ltd. November 2021 Paper 2 (Higher, calculator), question 10.
| Answer | £344 580.48 | 4 marks |
|---|
Worked solution Checked against the mark scheme
Louise: , so .
Sadiq: .
Sadiq's investment is worth £344 580.48.
Watch out: Using simple interest, or dividing by 1.075 instead of 1.025³.

© Pearson Education Ltd. November 2019 Paper 2 (Higher, calculator), question 13.
| Answer | 2.2 | 3 marks |
|---|
Worked solution Checked against the mark scheme
After 2 years:
Multiplier for year 3:
So
Watch out: Using simple interest for the first two years.

© Pearson Education Ltd. June 2018 Paper 2 (Higher, calculator), question 9.
| Answer | 4 marks |
|---|
Worked solution Checked against the mark scheme
Multiplier for year 1: , so
Year 2 rate:
Watch out: Applying 1.4% to the original £12 000 instead of £12 336.

© Pearson Education Ltd. November 2018 Paper 3 (Higher, calculator), question 13.
| Answer | 2 marks |
|---|
Worked solution Checked against the mark scheme
, so about animals.
Watch out: Applying the multiplier three times and getting 412.

© Pearson Education Ltd. Specimen Paper 3 (Higher, calculator), question 8.
| (a) | £2500 | 3 marks |
|---|---|---|
| (b) | The Saver Account: 4% compound for 5 years gives about 21.67% interest, which is more than 21% | 2 marks |
Worked solution Checked against the mark scheme
(a) Each year multiplies the amount by , so after 2 years it is multiplied by .
Original
(b) Saver Account: , so the interest is about .
Investment Account: .
, so the Saver Account is best.
Watch out: Taking off 6% (or dividing by 1.06) instead of dividing by 1.03².

© Pearson Education Ltd. November 2023 Paper 1 (Higher, non-calculator), question 16.
| (a) | million | 3 marks |
|---|---|---|
| (b) | Yes: the new value of is , which is greater than 1 | 1 mark |
Worked solution Checked against the mark scheme
(a) : , so
million
(b) New . Multiplying by a number greater than 1 each year makes the population grow, so Louise is correct.
Watch out: In (b), just saying 'yes because k increased' without noting it is now above 1.

© Pearson Education Ltd. November 2020 Paper 2 (Higher, calculator), question 19.
| Answer | 788.4 m | 4 marks |
|---|
Worked solution Checked against the mark scheme
, so .
At 09 17: .
At 09 18: m.
Watch out: Applying the rule only once, or three times, by miscounting the minutes.

© Pearson Education Ltd. Specimen Paper 3 (Higher, calculator), question 15.
| (a) | 3906 (3906 or 3907 accepted; 3900, 3910 or 4000 from correct working) | 2 marks |
|---|---|---|
| (b) | Either: no, the model halves each hour so it never reaches 0; or yes, in practice, since you can't have part of an error | 1 mark |
Worked solution Checked against the mark scheme
(a) , so about 3906 errors.
(b) In the model the number halves every hour, and halving a positive number never gives 0, so the model never reaches zero. (You could also argue that in reality the count must eventually drop below 1, and there can't be a fraction of an error.)
Watch out: Treating 2⁻⁸ as −16 or as −256.

© Pearson Education Ltd. November 2021 Paper 3 (Higher, calculator), question 19.
| Answer | 3 marks |
|---|
Worked solution Checked against the mark scheme
2017 to 2019 is two years, so .
, so
Watch out: Using (only one year of change).
Their main topic is different, but part of each one tests this topic.